Dictators, democrats, and constitutional dialogue: Myanmar’s constitutional tribunal
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
An empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the polish constitutional tribunal, 2003–2014
Different theories have been developed, mainly in the context of the United States, to explain judicial decision-making. In this respect, there is an important ongoing debate over whether judges are guided by the law or by personal ideology. The analysis of the decision-making in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal seems to support the existence of some party alignment. It is to say that judicia...
متن کاملP - values : Democrats or Dictators ?
Part of being a good analyst and statistician is being able to understand the output of a statistical test in SAS ® . Pvalues are ubiquitous in statistical output as well as medical literature and can be the deciding factor in whether a paper gets published. This shows a somewhat dictatorial side of them. But do we really know what they mean? In a democratic process, people vote for another per...
متن کاملConstitutional Theory, Constitutional Culture
Constitutional theorists and other constitutional commentators make heavy use of a paradigm that mistakes certain aspects of our current constitutional decisionmaking process for inherent parts of our constitutional structure and ignores other important aspects of that process entirely. These distortions and elisions raise concerns about the accuracy of much descriptive constitutional commentar...
متن کاملConstitutional Economics/Constitutional Politics
Why does the treatment of American constitutional politics presented in We the People depart so radically from models of constitutional deliberation developed in the type of constitutional economics pioneered by James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock? The paper defines three premises that account for the divergence, and concludes by proposing an inquiry into constitutional design that requires insig...
متن کاملConstitutional Amendment by Constitutional Desuetude
Scholars have shown that written constitutions may be informally amended in various ways, for instance by judicial interpretation, statute, or executive action. But scholars have yet to fully appreciate that written constitutions may also be informally amended by desuetude. Informal amendment by constitutional desue-tude occurs when a constitutional provision loses its binding force upon politi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Constitutional Law
سال: 2018
ISSN: 1474-2640,1474-2659
DOI: 10.1093/icon/moy056